🔗 Share this article

This talented musician constantly experienced the weight of her parent’s legacy. As the daughter of the celebrated composer Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, among the most famous UK artists of the 1900s, her name was enveloped in the long shadows of the past.

A World Premiere

In recent months, I reflected on these memories as I prepared to record the inaugural album of her concerto for piano composed in 1936. With its impassioned harmonies, expressive melodies, and valiant rhythms, her composition will grant audiences deep understanding into how this artist – a wartime composer originating from the early 1900s – imagined her world as a female composer of color.

Past and Present

However about the past. It requires time to acclimate, to see shapes as they truly exist, to distinguish truth from misinterpretation, and I felt hesitant to face the composer’s background for a while.

I deeply hoped the composer to be following in her father’s footsteps. In some ways, this was true. The rustic British sounds of her father’s impact can be observed in numerous compositions, including From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). However, one need only examine the headings of her parent’s works to see how he heard himself as not just a flag bearer of UK romantic tradition but a voice of the Black diaspora.

At this point father and daughter appeared to part ways.

White America evaluated Samuel by the mastery of his art instead of the colour of his skin.

Family Background

While he was studying at the prestigious music college, the composer – the offspring of a African father and a British mother – began embracing his background. Once the poet of color this literary figure came to London in 1897, the 21-year-old composer actively pursued him. He adapted Dunbar’s African Romances as a composition and the next year adapted his verses for an opera, Dream Lovers. This was followed by the choral work that put Samuel on the map: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Inspired by this American writer’s The Song of Hiawatha, this composition was an worldwide sensation, particularly among the Black community who felt vicarious pride as American society assessed his work by the quality of his music instead of the his race.

Principles and Actions

Fame did not reduce Samuel’s politics. At the turn of the century, he participated in the First Pan African Conference in the UK where he made the acquaintance of the Black American thinker the renowned Du Bois and saw a range of talks, such as the subjugation of African people in South Africa. He remained an advocate until the end. He sustained relationships with pioneers of civil rights like Du Bois and Booker T Washington, gave addresses on ending discrimination, and even talked about racial problems with President Theodore Roosevelt on a trip to the White House in that year. Regarding his compositions, reminisced Du Bois, “he made his mark so high as a musician that it will long be remembered.” He succumbed in that year, at 37 years old. However, how would the composer have thought of his daughter’s decision to work in the African nation in the 1950s?

Conflict and Policy

“Daughter of Famous Composer gives OK to S African Bias,” ran a headline in the community journal Jet magazine. This policy “seems to me the right policy”, she informed Jet. Upon further questioning, she qualified her remarks: she was not in favor with the system “fundamentally” and it “ought to be permitted to work itself out, directed by good-intentioned South Africans of every background”. Were the composer more in tune to her parent’s beliefs, or from the US under segregation, she might have thought twice about apartheid. But life had sheltered her.

Identity and Naivety

“I hold a English document,” she said, “and the officials never asked me about my background.” Therefore, with her “light” appearance (as Jet put it), she traveled within European circles, buoyed up by their acclaim for her renowned family member. She gave a talk about her father’s music at the Cape Town university and led the national orchestra in the city, featuring the bold final section of her concerto, subtitled: “In remembrance of my Father.” Even though a accomplished player herself, she avoided playing as the lead performer in her concerto. Instead, she invariably directed as the leader; and so the apartheid orchestra followed her lead.

She desired, in her own words, she “could introduce a transformation”. Yet in the mid-1950s, the situation collapsed. Once officials became aware of her mixed background, she was forced to leave the country. Her citizenship failed to safeguard her, the British high commissioner recommended her departure or be jailed. She came home, embarrassed as the extent of her naivety became clear. “The realization was a painful one,” she expressed. Compounding her embarrassment was the printing that year of her unfortunate magazine feature, a year after her forced leaving from South Africa.

A Familiar Story

As I sat with these memories, I felt a recurring theme. The narrative of holding UK citizenship until you’re not – which recalls Black soldiers who fought on behalf of the UK during the World War II and lived only to be refused rightful benefits. And the Windrush generation,