🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for our families – seems like it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements over subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals get paid would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker earning moderate income pays about 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you compare it to what average American pays. I know multiple businesses that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, those payments include retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When including these expenses versus our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of our government's defense, technology, social programs and transportation services, the system could be managed by private contractors rather than a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would render administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with major insurers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers as we no longer have access to workers' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that government play important functions in our lives, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would still be a better and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank well below many other countries in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this current situation is that we take serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.